|
Lynn_19
Female,
18-29
Asia
Joined: 9 yrs, 9 mos ago
5,872 Posts
|
|
|
|
Friday 10/13/06 - 1:09:27 PM
They test on animals [ Rate Link] - Known animal testing companies |
|
drurygal
Female,
30-39
Midwest US
Joined: 10 yrs, 10 mos ago
7,341 Posts
|
|
|
|
Friday 10/13/06 - 1:43:26 PM
I agree it's unnecessary for cosmetics and such. But the drug companies are REQUIRED to test on animals before the FDA will allow them to start human trials. That's my understanding anyway. |
|
Chickenman
Male,
13-17
Western US
Joined: 7 yrs, 3 mos ago
754 Posts
|
|
|
|
Friday 10/13/06 - 8:20:24 PM
What would be better to test on? Humans? You're telling me you'd rather test a product on humans than an animal? |
|
bwaybabe137
Female,
13-17
Eastern US
Joined: 6 yrs, 3 mos ago
179 Posts
|
|
|
|
Friday 10/13/06 - 8:31:37 PM
Well, its possible to make human skin as long as you have living skin cells... I'm disappointed in companies that do this, and yet, I use so many products from those companies. |
|
jennsync415
Female,
18-29
Western US
Joined: 5 yrs, 10 mos ago
1,899 Posts
|
|
|
|
Friday 10/13/06 - 10:44:48 PM
On 10/13/2006 8:31:38 PM bwaybabe137 wrote:
I'm disappointed in companies that do this, and yet, I use so many products from those companies. |
Oh so true. *sigh* |
|
Puzzle23
Female,
18-29
Midwest US
Joined: 7 yrs, 8 mos ago
8,549 Posts
|
|
|
|
Friday 10/13/06 - 11:38:27 PM
^^ likewise. i feel bad about it, but what other alternative is there? and if it advances our medical technology, i don't see it being so wrong. yes, i'm against testing a bunny for anti-wrinkle cream or foundation, but i'm all for reasonable medical experiments. *runs away before the PETA crew finds this thread* |
|
7451
Male,
70+
Canada
Joined: 6 yrs, 4 mos ago
5,554 Posts
|
|
|
|
Saturday 10/14/06 - 11:40:54 AM
"Max Factor (Procter & Gamble)" AAAAAAARGH! THOSE POOR, DEFENCLESS ANIMALS WILL HAVE LONGER, THICKER, MORE DEFINED EYELASHES! NOOOOOOOOO! |
9 comments 
Email
